this test is still borked as per #33.
the intent would be to get this test on a feature branch pertaining to that issue - the point being we should be able to rely on CI's boolean result for detecting (newly induced) regressions.
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#472
Co-authored-by: Kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
Co-committed-by: Kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
resolves error on CI run https://git.fediversity.eu/Fediversity/Fediversity/actions/runs/1026:
```
123456 error: attempt to call something which is not a function but a path: /nix/store/93yyf22vw60l1j3l6h02c99p93lp55q5-source/panel
at /nix/store/93yyf22vw60l1j3l6h02c99p93lp55q5-source/machines/dev/fedi201/fedipanel.nix:13:6:
12| imports = [
13| (../../../panel { }).module
| ^
14| "${sources.home-manager}/nixos"```
```
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#468
Now that we won't depend on the flake.nix anymore, we won't depend on all the flake-part.nix files (necessary to evaluate flake.nix) and all the files they depend on etc., so the Nix dependencies of the tests will be drastically reduced, and I will be able to leverage that by introducing a more subtle src. This will make the test not need to re-run if only things outside that reduced src changed (and the previous run is in the Nix store).
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#450
Reviewed-by: kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
Co-committed-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
This PR builds on top of #447 and #448. Since these might be rejected, there will be some changes needed for this PR as well. Let's see how the discussions go in #447.
In the meantime, @fricklerhandwerk, would you mind (in)validating the core idea of this PR? You only need to look at 7cf43c4041, really.
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#449
Reviewed-by: kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
Co-committed-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
This PR builds on top of #447 and will be subject to the same discussion. Let's discuss there whether it makes sense to get rid of the `flake-parts` and `git-hooks` flake inputs.
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#448
Reviewed-by: kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
Co-committed-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
The goal is to contain the “`mkFlake` hack” to a file that we can heavily document but otherwise ignore. This also will allow me to reuse it in the “flake under test” of the deployment tests.
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#447
Reviewed-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
Reviewed-by: kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
Co-committed-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
