Closes#277
Same as #329 but where we run the FediPanel and interact with it via a browser
instead of running NixOps4 directly.
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#361
Reviewed-by: kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
Co-committed-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
The tests still work because we manually write the deployer's public key in `/root/.ssh/authorized_keys` on the target machines. In itself, however, the configuration that we push does not allow the deployer to push anything on the target machines.
Context: Fediversity/Fediversity#361 (comment)
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#385
Reviewed-by: kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
Co-committed-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
Last part of #361.
Builds on top of #375.
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#376
Reviewed-by: kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
Co-committed-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
later we may want to distinguish dev vs host as well, tho eventually we expect not to have hard-coded machines anyway.
split off from #319.
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#367
Co-authored-by: Kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
Co-committed-by: Kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
@Niols the sheer amount of hassle and noise indicates that it may be better to first split out a `flake.nix` just for the tests. And all this clutter doesn't even explain yet *why* we thought it needs to be there.
closes#279.
Co-authored-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#374
Reviewed-by: kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
Co-authored-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
Co-committed-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
don't go through template generation but use underlying the tag
implementation directly
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#352
intending to document more about how our schemas work, i found our code currently buries this somewhere in `/nix/store`.
this change exposes that generated file in the project structure as well, facilitating inspection of our data schema in this more generic format.
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#351
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
Co-authored-by: Kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
Co-committed-by: Kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
points of attention (compared to ZHF pad):
- nouns vs verbs (feel free to improve!)
- some phrasing differences
- changed services to applications
- unified host to runtime environment as per diagram
- distinguish actors using rounded corners
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#340
Reviewed-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
use [update-npins](https://github.com/getchoo/update-npins) to automate dependency updates.
alternative renovatebot seemed to mostly support flakes so far, while it mostly seemed better at showing what packages got updated to which version. i figured that seemed not worth fixing for now, so settled for update-npins.
not sure how to test before merge, but i added the deploy token (with write rights) and exposed it as the referenced secret.
closes#65.
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#343
Co-authored-by: Kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
Co-committed-by: Kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
Closes Fediversity/Fediversity#276
This PR adds a CLI deployment test. It builds on top of Fediversity/Fediversity#323. This test features a deployer node and four target nodes. The deployer node runs `nixops4 apply` on a deployment built with our actual code in `deployment/default.nix`, which pushes onto the four target machines combinations of Garage/Mastodon/Peertube/Pixelfed depending on a JSON payload. We check that the expected services are indeed deployed on the machines. Getting there involved reworking the existing basic test to extract common patterns, and adding support for ACME certificates negotiation inside the NixOS test.
What works:
- deployer successfully runs `nixops4 apply` with various payloads
- target machines indeed get the right services pushed onto them and removed
- services on target machines successfully negotiate ACME certificates
What does not work: the services themselves depend a lot on DNS and that is not taken care of at all, so they are probably very broken. Still, this is a good milestone.
Test it yourself by running `nix build .#checks.x86_64-linux.deployment-basic -vL` and `nix build .#checks.x86_64-linux.deployment-cli -vL`. On the very beefy machine that I am using, the basic test runs in ~4 minutes and the CLI test in ~17 minutes. We know from Fediversity/Fediversity#323 that the basic test runs in ~12 minutes on the CI runner, so maybe about an hour for the CLI test?
Co-authored-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#329
Reviewed-by: kiara Grouwstra <kiara@procolix.eu>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
Co-committed-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
this shows a proof of concept for generating Django forms from NixOS modules
note that the form behavior is still rather clumsy and doesn't exactly map to the module semantics:
- since forms can only be sent wholesale, empty form fields will show up as empty strings
and break validation without additional cleanup (not done here)
- it's not possible to faithfully translate `type = submodule { /* ... */}; default = {};`, since the default
is translated to an empty dict `{}`. this is because the JSON schema converter does not preserve type information.
this can be added by making it use `$defs` [1], but that would likely amount to half a rewrite
- there's a glitch in enum default values that needs to be fixed in `datamodel-code-generator` [0]
[0]: dd44480359/src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/base.py (L1015)
[1]: https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/structuring#defs
a generated file will be placed into the source (by the development shell and the package respectively)
that declares Pydantic types from which to render the form. it looks something like this:
```python
from __future__ import annotations
from enum import Enum
from typing import Optional
from pydantic import BaseModel, Extra, Field
from drf_pydantic import BaseModel
class Domain(Enum):
fediversity_net = 'fediversity.net'
# ...
class Model(BaseModel):
class Config:
extra = Extra.forbid
domain: Optional[Domain] = Field(
'fediversity.net',
description='Apex domain under which the services will be deployed.\n',
)
# ...
```
This PR adds a basic deployment test to the repository. This test will, in a NixOS test, run a deployer VM and a target VM, and check that we manage to run `nixops4 apply` on the deployer VM to change things on the target VM. The ideas are all @roberth's and this test has been extremely heavily inspired by https://github.com/nixops4/nixops4-nixos/blob/main/test/default/nixosTest.nix.
Reviewed-on: Fediversity/Fediversity#323
Reviewed-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
Co-committed-by: Nicolas “Niols” Jeannerod <nicolas.jeannerod@moduscreate.com>
