Fediversity/meta
7
1
Fork 2
Code Issues 12 Pull requests 1 Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity

moved examples to footnote

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Koen de Jonge 2024-09-16 09:49:57 +02:00
parent 811c0eede7
commit a5945d8299
1 changed files with 12 additions and 9 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

19
Fediversity_target_audience.md
View file

@ -14,14 +14,7 @@ When in our project plan it is mentioned that we use 'Open Source Software' we m
* Not governed by a 'tech giant' (companies that have more than 10.000 employees) * Not governed by a 'tech giant' (companies that have more than 10.000 employees)
* In a fully open 'ecosystem' (no 'opencore') * In a fully open 'ecosystem' (no 'opencore')
We are especially vigilant towards systems that are open source, but require (excessive) payments to get to 'the good stuff' or lock you in to a non-open ecosystem. If alternatives exist we will prefer to use those. We are especially vigilant towards systems that are open source, but require (excessive) payments to get to 'the good stuff' or lock you in to a non-open ecosystem. If alternatives exist we will prefer to use those. Examples[^1].
Examples of this are (with alternatives):
* docker (alternative: lxc)
* kubernetes
* zimbra (alternative: normal mailservers)
* macOS (alternative: NixOS)
* MySQL (alternative MariaDB)
* GitLab (alternative: Forgejo)
The most important reason for this is that we want to make the barrier to use our proposed setup as low as possible, both in cost as in legal options. The most important reason for this is that we want to make the barrier to use our proposed setup as low as possible, both in cost as in legal options.
@ -60,3 +53,13 @@ Micro-cloud providers are small (not for profit) organisations that consist at l
* experienced local sales and marketing staff (to get a durable client base) * experienced local sales and marketing staff (to get a durable client base)
These micro-cloud providers should (based on the tooling that we provide) be able to supply 1000's of customers with access to the Fediverse without the need to use Big Tech. These micro-cloud providers should (based on the tooling that we provide) be able to supply 1000's of customers with access to the Fediverse without the need to use Big Tech.
[^1]:
Examples of non-open ecosystems are (with alternatives):
* docker (alternative: lxc)
* kubernetes
* zimbra (alternative: normal mailservers)
* macOS (alternative: NixOS)
* MySQL (alternative MariaDB)
* GitLab (alternative: Forgejo)