forked from fediversity/meta
		
	2025-07-22 developer sync
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									fa2900a0e0
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						07f2f9471d
					
				
					 1 changed files with 20 additions and 0 deletions
				
			
		
							
								
								
									
										20
									
								
								meeting-notes/2025-07-22 developer sync.md
									
										
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										20
									
								
								meeting-notes/2025-07-22 developer sync.md
									
										
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
 | 
			
		|||
Attendees: @kiara @fricklerhandwerk @niols
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
- CI still bad: checkout action flaky, secrets exposed to all contributors
 | 
			
		||||
  - We discussed switching to Gerrit (for review suggestions) and buildbot-nix (for CI)
 | 
			
		||||
  - It will be a lot of effort, but it's already a lot of effort and we better spend it now than when more people join the project
 | 
			
		||||
  - Chances are this will solve the secrets issue automatically
 | 
			
		||||
- Regressions in Proxmox provisioning
 | 
			
		||||
  - needs tests and docs, `proxmox-provision.sh` was written ad hoc beginning of the year
 | 
			
		||||
  - we haven't been exercising our knowledge of provisioning since
 | 
			
		||||
  - would be nice to rewrite in Python, also as a way to turn it into a NixOps4 resource provider
 | 
			
		||||
- NixOps4 future:
 | 
			
		||||
  - @roberth signaled the path to nested deployments may not be all that long
 | 
			
		||||
  - @fricklerhandwerk: currently our use case is perfectly suited by the state of affairs (especially having everything one language), but eventually we'll need something more powerful
 | 
			
		||||
  - @niols: dry run threatens to be a can of worms with nested deployments
 | 
			
		||||
    - @fricklerhandwerk: we'd need to mock away everything, we don't have a programming pattern for that yet (sigh)
 | 
			
		||||
    - @niols: for now we expose only the NixOS configurations to get evaluated separately
 | 
			
		||||
- @kiara kept dabbling at the data model, fixing small issues
 | 
			
		||||
  - @fricklerhandwerk will go through the WIP branch and cherry-pick what works
 | 
			
		||||
- @niols will add tests to provisioning code to fix regressions from recent refactorings
 | 
			
		||||
  - will start refactoring `infra/flake-parts.nix` to remove the wild function passing
 | 
			
		||||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		
		Reference in a new issue