forked from fediversity/meta
		
	Notes after viewing architecture discussion.
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									3bdc08106d
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						8d68fc65ed
					
				
					 1 changed files with 79 additions and 0 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -0,0 +1,79 @@ | |||
| 3 Layers: | ||||
| * Management | ||||
| * Virtualization | ||||
| * Hardware | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| == Management == | ||||
| Parameters like 'domain-name' and 'e-mail name' | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| - resource provider (what is it exactly, definition? API tussen NixOPS and Central DB) | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Central databases: | ||||
| * accounting data | ||||
| * state of the system | ||||
| * netbox - 'network layout' (maar dat is meer) | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Do we need a 'monolith' database that contains all the 'soll' (source of truth) state? | ||||
| Central database should be 'high availability' (should never be down) | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| => data model | ||||
| - is that part of the architecture? | ||||
| - how can it evolve (procedures!)? | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Golden standard flow: | ||||
| - Name and version of service definition is known | ||||
| - Operator enters 'choices' (can be hostnames, configuration options, styles etc) in to NixPanel | ||||
| - NixPanel makes API request | ||||
| - That is then fed to NixOPS | ||||
| - NixOPS gathers and evaluates needed resources (IP-addresses, Virtual Machine(s), Storage, DNS-entries, (system)e-mail addresses) | ||||
| - NixOPS creates the needed resources and updates the 'state' database and 'accounting' database and feeds that back to other systems | ||||
| - NixPanel gets 'system ready' state from the 'state' database and presents that to the Operator | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| TODO: put in UML | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| TODO: Case story 'if you want to build' it works like this. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| TODO: Glossary of 'terms and definitions' | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| TODO: 'create' 'use' 'destroy' | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| REMARK: secrets manamagement != identity management | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| TODO: user-stories 'Operators' and 'Service Managers' etc. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| == Services and FediServices == | ||||
| It makes more sense to split those on a technical base: | ||||
| It does not really make a lot of sense | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| == API == | ||||
| NixConfigurator: NixOPS + ssh | ||||
| VirtualisationProvider: currently Proxmox but could be replaced/extended. | ||||
| Email: Stalwart | ||||
| DNS: deSEC? (Ronny is pushing for a non-NixOS dns solution) | ||||
| IdentityManagement: ? | ||||
| ObjectStorage: Garage | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| == Bootstrapping == | ||||
| * Creates all the needed infrastructure on hardware | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Misconception: NORDUnet does not need any insight in the architecture. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Non-NixOS virtual machines: place them out of scope. | ||||
| We DO care about Proxmox not being NixOS right now, we just cannot fix everything at the same time. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| == Backups == | ||||
| * All configuration that is 'scope of the provider' should be backupped (using ZFS snapshots and database dumps) | ||||
| * All 'user data' should be backupped by having 'another provider' that this is replicated to (also safeguards against lock-in) | ||||
| BACKUPS | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| WE DO NOT GIVE 'backup to Amazon as an example' | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| == Hardware layer == | ||||
| Is wel degelijk onderdeel van het project. | ||||
| Is niet 'just there' want we hebben dat helemaal ontworpen en in elkaar gezet en daar zijn best wel uren in gegaan. | ||||
| Wat daar mist is de documentatie en het 'hoe doe je dat nu eigenlijk' documentatie | ||||
| Dit is best een integraal onderdeel van het project. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Koen de Jonge
						Koen de Jonge