forked from Fediversity/Fediversity
add todo concerning palpable content
This commit is contained in:
parent
9e97ca3f14
commit
c60d10b355
|
@ -557,7 +557,14 @@ let
|
|||
}));
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
config.categories = [ "flow" ] ++ [ "palpable" ];
|
||||
# XXX: here we can't express the spec requirement that `dl` is palpable if the list of term-description-pairs is nonempty.
|
||||
# the reason is that we have to specify a child's *type* in the parent, but being palpable is a property of the value in this case.
|
||||
# and while the module system does have some dependent typing capabilities, we can't say "the type is X but only if its value has property Y".
|
||||
# but since the "palpable" category isn't used in any structural requirement in the spec, this is not a loss of fidelity on our side.
|
||||
# TODO: the whole notion of content categories may be a red herring for this implementation after all, reconsider it.
|
||||
# it does help to concisely express type constraints on an element's children, but it seems that most of the categories in the spec can be ignored entirely in this implementation.
|
||||
# the cleanup task would be to identify which categories are really helpful, and document the rationale for using that mechanism as well as the specific choice of categories to keep.
|
||||
config.categories = [ "flow" ];
|
||||
config.__toString = self:
|
||||
with lib;
|
||||
let
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue