Merge branch 'main' of git.fediversity.eu:Fediversity/meta

meeting-notes/2025-03-31 demo rehearsel.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+**Demo rehearsel:** 2025-03-31 @10:00     
+**Present:** Kiara, Koen, Ronny, Kevin, Gheorghe, Robert, Bjorn, Valentin, Nicolas, Hans  
+**Absent:** Eric (known)  
+
+__Agenda__  
+* Koen starts with presenting
+* Kevin will present the demo  
+
+__Presentation & Demo notes__   
+* Financed by EC, not "being" from EC. 
+* I suggest to say Prototype and not Product for now.
+* I thought we were going to use the coloured EU flag(@Ronnynote: Koen is using an older version of the pdf.../ auch, okay)
+* We need a bit more 'what is the mvp about'/'what is the demo about'
+* s/Hello world/Welcome
+* First show that the apps are not deployed yet. Let people visit the urls themselves 
+* Can we make the split screen in demo wide, instead of long? (@kevinnote: yes but this was only normal sized monitor i have at the moment)
+* Because of the elementary graphical interface, maybe a lower resolution of display will make the command text greater.
+* When speak about the interface would be nice to have it visible on the screen.
+* The argument for having ops done by professionals needs some polish => we are targeted at organisations (if you can run your own hardware, go!)
+* Why skip slides? Will not skip.
+* benefits providers: these are the benefits FOR providers
+* Maybe don't switch between the presentation & demo. It's a bit distracting. (hans: I think that's a good thing, it breaks it up in different bits that makes it a bit more lively)
+* I would suggest to add in the benefits and the other images also the Services offered to the Users to give the whole image of the prototype.
+* The architecture diagram is an old one. The NixPanel is no more there.
+* Nix is not an operating system ;..)
+	* roberth: One term keeps it simple and is good enough
+	* Nix is a system for building software more reproducibly
+* The old NixPanel in the architecture is not mapped by the Django(Python) description.
+* People can't write comments on Forgejo without an account, and there's no way to register
+* Why not Develop & contribute Django (Python) in How to participate?
+* Incantation -> Incarnation

meeting-notes/2025-03-31 standup notes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+​**Standup:** 2025-03-31 @09:30  
+**Present:** Kiara, Koen, Ronny, Kevin, Gheorghe, Robert, Bjorn, Valentin, Nicolas   
+**Absent:** Hans (known), Eric (known)   
+
+* Kiara
+	* Past day(s): continue on deploy button online
+	* Today: investigate SSH strategy for above and to deal with password-protected SSH keys
+* Koen
+	* now have some experience with pixelfed
+	* want ​to upgrade the pixelfed cluster this afternoon and bring it live this evening so we can announce it tomorrow before the conference
+* Kevin
+	* Worked on the panel friday, it shows now if the deploy was a succes and which services have been deployed
+	* today can work more on the panel but dont know what yet will discuss with kiara
+* Bjorn
+	* Friday: Partnermeeting 
+	* Today: demo & prep for Fediforum
+* Valentin
+	* Wrote up design discussion on configuration data model versioning and format conversion
+	* Internal meetings
+* Nicolas
+	* Last week disabling the machine
+	* Working on reproducing the NixOps4 upstream deployment test
+		* Got stuck with providing DNS within the sandbox
+			* Robert: there's some code I can give you for that
+* Gheorghe
+	* No blockers
+	* Friday: Internal PM activities
+	* Today: Internal PM activities
+* Ronny
+	* Good partnermeeting on Friday
+* Robert
+	* Finishing up flake input override support (needed for ad hoc testing, generally useful)
+	* Next: stateful resources

meeting-notes/2025-03-31-design-meeting.md

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# Visual design meeting 2025-03-31
+
+Present: {thijs,timon}@slik, {koen,kevin,kiara}@procolix
+
+- thijs: updated the designs as per the last meeting, supporting workspaces, dark/light themes, (implied) usage graphs, future fediverse services, updated theme
+- koen: maybe categorize services using tags, e.g. fediverse, productivity, chat, video, microblogging
+- thijs: so allow filtering by this too?
+- koen: yes
+- kiara: i like the new design
+- koen: KDE's designs looks pretty, maybe also look at that
+- timon: *clicks mastodon install, leading to detail page*
+- koen: maybe allow batch selecting to install, as in current barebones technical implementation
+- koen: please add icons for more applications
+- timon: *showing preview page for mastodon*
+- koen: again, minimize needed clicks, e.g. using basic vs advanced install rather than 'install' vs 'manage', then allow users to maybe tweak after
+- thijs: then just do 'install' vs 'manage' as you probably don't want non-basic installs, so people can tweak after
+- koen: you should be able to just use them when installed, afterwards change 'install' button to like 'go to your instance'
+- koen: i like the detail page's log view, may end up long tho, so maybe add a 'show more' ellsion
+- timon: fleshed out the settings view, as well as a users list
+- thijs: the users list is more an example of a CRUD page, as you mentioned wanting to do SSO/LDAP before
+- koen: again, distinguish stuff everyone should see vs advanced settings we by default should not bother busy non-technical users with
+- thijs: you have not configured a domain yet, so cannot deploy mastodon yet - we should probably nag people on mandatory settings they have yet to set, also show progress bar for this
+- koen: start simple, then show everything when desired
+- thijs: different ways to not scare people off, not sure scaring people with advanced settings is the way, you could instead just show optional settings
+- koen: still sounds scary
+- thijs: otherwise may not notice what you can do with it
+- thijs: you may not know a user's role up-front
+- koen: start as basic user
+- thijs: sysadmins will feel confused tho
+- koen: maybe ask in the onboarding / sign-up what role you want
+- thijs: onboarding, what else?
+- thijs: we made sure to use only open-source fonts and icons
+- koen: i see some details we will not use: e.g. pricing plans ending in 99, pricing plans worded to sell rather than offer transparency (wording shown in design: 'perfect' without elaboration as to why), pricing that needs explaining so people can understand why they should not feel ripped off
+- kiara: isn't usage much more fungible?
+- koen: we should show those from the panel, but there are different ways to approach this as per an operator's business model
+- thijs: maybe hosts should get to choose how to approach this
+- koen: agree, companies will have limited resources and may prefer to not make things too granular, tho in larger set-ups one may need to be able to better justify how pricing scales
+- thijs: do we always want granular pricing?
+- koen: by default yes, if you don't want that, it's open-source so you can fork if you like
+- thijs: thanks - what else should we change for tomorrow?
+- koen: maybe add graphs over time on disk space and number of applications deployed
+- kiara: actually whether the background looks grey or white-ish for me depends on which monitor i view it on
+- thijs: ok let's make it a bit lighter still
+- koen: maybe also add user settings like advanced/novice, allow scrolling thru the app list, add an icon as per fediversity.eu (NGI - fediversity)
+- koen: from pic 'many branches of the fediverse' use: lemmy, bookwyrm, funkwhale, friendica, castopod, writefreely, matrix, owncast, peertube, forgejo, passbolt
+- kiara: this image already shows potential tags too
+- thijs: we'll try and add the configurable color themes too