LXC container deployment #724

Closed
opened 2026-02-10 13:06:36 +01:00 by kiara · 2 comments
Owner

our hypervisor deployment currently deploys to VMs, see test deployment-tf-proxmox.
we could instead just use the (lighter-weight) containers instead, which are similarly supported and do not need their own kernel.

implementation notes

our hypervisor deployment currently deploys to VMs, see test `deployment-tf-proxmox`. we could instead just use the (lighter-weight) containers instead, which are [similarly supported](https://registry.terraform.io/providers/bpg/proxmox/latest/docs/resources/virtual_environment_container) and do not need their own kernel. ### implementation notes - options - ~~nspawn~~ - less aimed at hardening / multi-tenancy? - ~~[`systemd-nspawn`](https://wiki.nixos.org/wiki/NixOS_Containers) (no UI or TF?)~~ - LXC - proxmox: [blocked on `proxmox-nixos`](https://github.com/SaumonNet/proxmox-nixos/issues/140) ([TF](https://registry.terraform.io/providers/bpg/proxmox/latest/docs/resources/virtual_environment_container)) - [`incus`](https://linuxcontainers.org/incus/) (leaner, [TF](https://registry.terraform.io/providers/lxc/incus/latest)) - ~~OCI~~ (would imply modular services, see #598) - ~~[`nimi`](https://weyl-ai.github.io/nimi/)~~ - ~~[kubernetes](https://git.fediversity.eu/fediversity/meta/src/branch/main/meeting-notes/2026-03-05-kelsey-chat-kubernetes.md) (#598)~~ - ... - compare: #721 (tests)
kiara changed title from container deployment to LXC container deployment 2026-05-23 10:47:37 +02:00
Author
Owner

fwiw docker switched away from LXC - long-run we probably should further investigate OCI (c.f. #598 / #620)

fwiw docker [switched away](https://docs.docker.com/engine/release-notes/prior-releases/#runtime-19) from LXC - long-run we probably should further investigate OCI (c.f. #598 / #620)
Author
Owner

closed in #1205, for which we deployed a hypervisor to dev1 (192.168.51.101)

closed in #1205, for which we deployed a hypervisor to `dev1` (`192.168.51.101`)
kiara closed this issue 2026-07-25 16:10:43 +02:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Reference
fediversity/fediversity#724
No description provided.