panel nix package allows declaring users #382
Labels
No labels
0 points
0.5 points
1 point
13 points
2 points
21 points
3 points
34 points
5 points
55 points
8 points
ambition
application-offering
ambition
configure-applications
ambition
front-end
ambition/install-applications
ambition
security
ambition
switch-host
ambition
update-applications
ambition
user-management
api service
blocked
component: fediversity panel
component: nixops4
documentation
estimation high: >3d
estimation low: <2h
estimation mid: <8h
infinite points
productisation
project-management
question
role: application developer
role: application operator
role: hosting provider
role: maintainer
security
technical debt
testing
type unclear
type: bug
type: deliverable
type: key result
type: objective
type: task
type: user story
user experience
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Blocks
#224 automated dev-ops workflows
fediversity/fediversity
Reference
fediversity/fediversity#382
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
As a developer,
I want the panel nix package to allow declaring panel users,
so that the software gets easier to use and test.
implementation notes
django-auth-ldapkiara referenced this issue2025-06-16 13:58:16 +02:00
What type of users? Of the panel?
yes - adjusted story now
i'm not sure i still feel the same on this.
while the feature of users had been pushed for the demo panel with the idea of multi-tenant environments being a core goal, whether this still remains the case seems subject to how we end up perceiving our scope, given the talk of having the front-end shifted to ProcoliX instead.
we at this point got multi-tenant support in the panel already (#967), unblocking this, tho security (and avoiding hard-coding?) may be reasons to avoid this.
manually this could be done using just:
maybe for now it's better if this isn't automated.