clear VMs for demo #273
Labels
No labels
ambition
application-offering
ambition
configure-applications
ambition
front-end
ambition/install-applications
ambition
security
ambition
switch-host
ambition
update-applications
ambition
user-management
blocked
component
api-service
component
fediversity-panel
component
nixops4
documentation
points
0
points
0.5
points
1
points
13
points
2
points
21
points
3
points
34
points
5
points
55
points
8
points
infinite
productisation
project-management
question
role
application-developer
role
application-operator
role
hosting-provider
role
maintainer
security
technical debt
testing
type
bug
type
deliverable
type
key-result
type
objective
type
task
type
unclear
type
user-story
user experience
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Blocks
#226 OKR: demo
fediversity/fediversity
#286 allow accessing test vms from fedi201
fediversity/fediversity
Reference
fediversity/fediversity#273
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
As Fediversity,
I want to be able to reset our VMs (test01~04) to a 'clean' state,
so that our demo may show what our application can do.
kiara referenced this issue2025-04-01 14:00:36 +02:00
notably test03's ssh access seems botched
One rather brutal way of achieving this is:
I suppose it wouldn't be so hard to have a script simply re-install over an existing VM, without having to create it.
@Niols weird, regardless of vm picked, the remove script gives me this error.
to be fair, even in the web interface i don't see options to ditch a vm - is that normal @kevin or might my proxmox user lack certain permissions?
I get:
Do you get the same when creating VMs?
@Niols nope 😶 (expand my
<summary>above for log).thanks tho!
trying provisioning for that one now, which also seems to fail for me:
with the demo having passed i'll close in favor of #116