user control over update timing #206

New issue

Closed

opened 2025-02-26 11:13:18 +01:00 by kiara · 2 comments

kiara commented

2025-02-26 11:13:18 +01:00

Owner

As a user, I want to retain control over when to deploy state/application updates, so that I can plan downtime at a time that is more convenient.

**As** a user, **I want** to retain control over when to deploy state/application updates, **so that** I can plan downtime at a time that is more convenient.

kiara commented

2025-02-26 11:17:58 +01:00

Author

Owner

today we had a meeting on this, tho scoped down to consider updating all applications for a user at once, rather than individually.

this seemed to already imply having to switch state representations to json (validated by json schema) to decouple our django application from the versions to be deployed.

today we had a [meeting](https://git.fediversity.eu/Fediversity/meta/src/commit/2a4f516b7c2ac0b08d6264d2d1f69dda9ba343f1/meeting-notes/2025-02-26-architecture-discussion.md) on this, tho scoped down to consider updating all applications for a user at once, rather than individually. this seemed to already imply having to switch state representations to json (validated by json schema) to decouple our django application from the versions to be deployed.

kiara commented

2025-02-26 11:19:41 +01:00

Author

Owner

as per @koen we may currently regard this use-case out-of-scope.
nevertheless, the architectural concerns w.r.t. decoupling may nevertheless remain relevant for the purpose of migration (#100).

as per @koen we may currently regard this use-case out-of-scope. nevertheless, the architectural concerns w.r.t. decoupling may nevertheless remain relevant for the purpose of migration (#100).

kiara closed this issue

2025-02-26 11:19:41 +01:00

~~kiara referenced this issue 2025-02-26 11:23:55 +01:00~~

migrating application data between hosting providers #100

kiara added a new dependency

2025-04-08 16:47:21 +02:00

#304 reference front-end is decoupled from version of configuration module