Fediversity/meta
13
3
Fork 4
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Add meeting-notes/2025-03-31 demo rehearsel.md

Browse source 
Notes made during the demo rehearsel
This commit is contained in:
bjornw 2025-03-31 14:19:23 +02:00
parent ae0ca796de
commit 9b950763b8
1 changed files with 31 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

31
meeting-notes/2025-03-31 demo rehearsel.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
**Demo rehearsel:** 2025-03-31 @09:30
**Present:** Kiara, Koen, Ronny, Kevin, Gheorghe, Robert, Bjorn, Valentin, Nicolas, Hans
**Absent:** Eric (known)
__Agenda__
* Koen starts with presenting
* Kevin will present the demo
__Presentation & Demo notes__
* Financed by EC, not "being" from EC.
* I suggest to say Prototype and not Product for now.
* I thought we were going to use the coloured EU flag(@Ronnynote: Koen is using an older version of the pdf.../ auch, okay)
* We need a bit more 'what is the mvp about'/'what is the demo about'
* s/Hello world/Welcome
* First show that the apps are not deployed yet. Let people visit the urls themselves
* Can we make the split screen in demo wide, instead of long? (@kevinnote: yes but this was only normal sized monitor i have at the moment)
* Because of the elementary graphical interface, maybe a lower resolution of display will make the command text greater.
* When speak about the interface would be nice to have it visible on the screen.
* The argument for having ops done by professionals needs some polish => we are targeted at organisations (if you can run your own hardware, go!)
* Why skip slides? Will not skip.
* benefits providers: these are the benefits FOR providers
* Maybe don't switch between the presentation & demo. It's a bit distracting. (hans: I think that's a good thing, it breaks it up in different bits that makes it a bit more lively)
* I would suggest to add in the benefits and the other images also the Services offered to the Users to give the whole image of the prototype.
* The architecture diagram is an old one. The NixPanel is no more there.
* Nix is not an operating system ;..)
* roberth: One term keeps it simple and is good enough
* Nix is a system for building software more reproducibly
* The old NixPanel in the architecture is not mapped by the Django(Python) description.
* People can't write comments on Forgejo without an account, and there's no way to register
* Why not Develop & contribute Django (Python) in How to participate?
* Incantation -> Incarnation