Contract-test our interaction with NixOps4 #90
Labels
No labels
ambition
application-offering
ambition
configure-applications
ambition
front-end
ambition/install-applications
ambition
security
ambition
switch-host
ambition
update-applications
ambition
user-management
blocked
component
api-service
component
fediversity-panel
component
nixops4
documentation
points
0
points
0.5
points
1
points
13
points
2
points
21
points
3
points
34
points
5
points
55
points
8
points
infinite
productisation
project-management
question
role
application-developer
role
application-operator
role
hosting-provider
role
maintainer
security
technical debt
testing
type
bug
type
deliverable
type
key-result
type
objective
type
task
type
unclear
type
user-story
user experience
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
fediversity/fediversity#90
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
NixOps4 is still under heavy development, and we need to make sure that when we're interfacing with it, our code doesn't break when updating NixOps4. Having our own test guards against accidental backwards-incompatible changes on the NixOps4 side that will break our deployments at time of use. Instead we will get notified at time of dependency update by a failing test.
Thinking about it, we probably want to have our entire deployment tested against a simulated environment to exercise all the code paths currently in use...
You can use the nixops4-nixos VM test as a reference. (permalink)
Ideally we also make use of the fact that these tests are modules, so we can factor out common bits if that makes sense.
Probably the
deployernode can be factored into anixops4-nixos.modules.nixosTests.test-inframodule or something. Maybe also other things. Options can be added to controltestScriptand whatnot, as needed.closing in favor of #276